{"id":10942,"date":"2015-08-28T12:56:12","date_gmt":"2015-08-28T16:56:12","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.portlandmonthly.com\/portmag\/?p=10942"},"modified":"2015-08-28T12:56:12","modified_gmt":"2015-08-28T16:56:12","slug":"sticking-to-the-art","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.portlandmonthly.com\/portmag\/sticking-to-the-art\/","title":{"rendered":"Sticking To The Art"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>September 2015 | <a href=\"http:\/\/www.portlandmonthly.com\/pdf\/Sticking%20to%20the%20Art%20Sept15.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">view this story as a .pdf<\/a><\/p>\n<h3 class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">While the world hunts David Driskell for his opinions about the Cosby collection on exhibit at the Smithsonian, he drops a hint with us, in Maine. <\/span><\/h3>\n<p class=\"p3\"><span class=\"s1\">From Staff &amp; Wire Reports<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p5\"><span class=\"s1\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-10943\" src=\"http:\/\/www.portlandmonthly.com\/portmag\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/08\/Sticking-to-the-Art-Sept15.jpg\" alt=\"Sticking-to-the-Art-Sept15\" width=\"400\" height=\"300\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.portlandmonthly.com\/portmag\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/08\/Sticking-to-the-Art-Sept15.jpg 400w, https:\/\/www.portlandmonthly.com\/portmag\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/08\/Sticking-to-the-Art-Sept15-300x225.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.portlandmonthly.com\/portmag\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/08\/Sticking-to-the-Art-Sept15-200x150.jpg 200w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 400px) 100vw, 400px\" \/>We should remember that the real man behind this collection is David Driskell,\u201d writes the <em>Washington Post<\/em> about the Smithsonian Institution\u2019s exhibit that is sparking so much controversy: \u201cConversations: African and American Artworks in Dialogue.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p6\"><span class=\"s1\">This is the very David C. Driskell, co-curator of the Smithsonian show and for decades the scholar and art consultant who has brought the Camille and William Cosby collection to an elite sphere, that so many Mainers revere as a likable Falmouth resident, world-class painter, and curatorial expert on world painting. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p6\">Driskell has been friends with Bill and Camille Cosby since Cosby called him in 1976 (see our interview, \u201cThe Prime of David Driskell,\u201d Sept. 2001). No doubt uncomfortable with the controversy, Driskell has remained eloquently silent. Consider <em>Artnet News<\/em>: \u201cWe also reached out to David Driskell, the co-curator of the show who is also a longtime friend and advisor to Cosby, as well as to Cosby\u2019s attorney Marty Singer for comment about whether the accusations have impacted the museum show. Neither responded.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"p6\"><span class=\"s1\">If you were in Driskell\u2019s position, would you respond? As an index to the controversy about Bill Cosby as he relates to art, <em>Artnet<\/em> reports, \u201cIn a November 15 radio interview conducted at the Smithsonian that took the term \u2018awkward silence\u2019 to an entirely new level, NPR reporter Scott Simon talked with Bill and Camille Cosby in detail about the [62] artworks they loaned to the show. At the end of the four-minute segment, viewers were treated to roughly 30 seconds of dead air when Simon asked Cosby to comment on the allegations as Cosby shook his head no and wagged his finger at Simon\u2026\u201d This dead air time was, according to the<em> Washington Post<\/em>, \u201cperhaps the most significant dead air in the history of National Public Radio.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p6\"><span class=\"s1\">Then there\u2019s \u201cPublic split over Cosby\u2019s art at the Smithsonian,\u201d by Brett Zongker of the Associated Press, which appeared in the <em>Post<\/em>. Here, once again, Driskell\u2019s name comes up most respectfully, with a quote from him tantalizingly absent. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p6\"><span class=\"s1\">Kudos to our \u201cFlash\u201d editor, Diane Hudson, who had the moxie to ask Driskell what the situation was when she covered his art opening at a Portland gallery. Here is Driskell, thoughtful and, it must be assumed, hurt:<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p6\"><span class=\"s1\">\u201cAs a curator hired by the Smithsonian in connection with this exhibit, I have been asked not to speak publicly about the controversy until my contract ends on January 16. You have not seen any comments from me about the exhibit as all the interviewers want to talk to me about Bill Cosby. I have no information about that and cannot speak to it. I can, however, speak about the art, and tell you that the art speaks for itself. This work by major American artists [including Beaufort Delaney, Jacob Lawrence, Elizabeth Catlett, Romare Berden, Faith Ringgold, Driskell himself, Alma Thomas, and Henry Ossawa Tanner] has never before been seen in public, and may never be provided that opportunity again. An extension of the American canon, the exhibit provides an invaluable educational opportunity that should not be lost\u2026 The Smithsonian reports attendance has more than doubled since the opening of this exhibit, and I do not think that is because of the controversy surrounding it.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p6\"><span class=\"s1\">The show goes on.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>September 2015<br \/>\nWhile the world hunts David Driskell for his opinions about the Cosby collection on exhibit at the Smithsonian, he drops a hint with us, in Maine.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":10944,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[8],"tags":[96],"class_list":["post-10942","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-featured","tag-september-2015"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.portlandmonthly.com\/portmag\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10942","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.portlandmonthly.com\/portmag\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.portlandmonthly.com\/portmag\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portlandmonthly.com\/portmag\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portlandmonthly.com\/portmag\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10942"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.portlandmonthly.com\/portmag\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10942\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10946,"href":"https:\/\/www.portlandmonthly.com\/portmag\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10942\/revisions\/10946"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portlandmonthly.com\/portmag\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10944"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.portlandmonthly.com\/portmag\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10942"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portlandmonthly.com\/portmag\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10942"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portlandmonthly.com\/portmag\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10942"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}