{"id":1767,"date":"2010-02-08T10:00:56","date_gmt":"2010-02-08T17:00:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.portlandmonthly.com\/portmag\/?p=1767"},"modified":"2010-02-23T10:21:47","modified_gmt":"2010-02-23T17:21:47","slug":"dream-boat-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.portlandmonthly.com\/portmag\/dream-boat-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Dream Boat"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>February\/March 2010<\/p>\n<p><strong>Will the aircraft carrier USS <\/strong><em><strong>Kennedy <\/strong><\/em><strong>become a boffo tourist attraction on the Portland waterfront? The deeper question: When was the last time our city took a<\/strong><em><strong> risk<\/strong><\/em><strong>?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><span>By Jason Stevenson<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-1771\" style=\"margin-left: 6px; margin-right: 6px;\" title=\"ship2\" src=\"http:\/\/www.portlandmonthly.com\/portmag\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/02\/ship2.jpg\" alt=\"ship2\" width=\"350\" height=\"250\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.portlandmonthly.com\/portmag\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/02\/ship2.jpg 350w, https:\/\/www.portlandmonthly.com\/portmag\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/02\/ship2-300x214.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 350px) 100vw, 350px\" \/>There are many ways to see the USS <em>John F. Kennedy<\/em>. Driving Interstate 95 near Philadelphia, you can spot the aircraft carrier\u2019s T-shaped radar mast looming over rusty warehouses. Looking down from a plane on final approach to the airport, you can marvel at her flight deck that\u2019s as long as three football fields. And from a concrete pier jutting into the Delaware River, your gaze can climb the gray steel hull to see pigeons landing where warplanes once soared. No matter your vantage point, this decommissioned carrier sits as silent and empty as a ghost ship. For two years, the <em>JFK<\/em> has inhabited this lonely berth on the outskirts of Philadelphia, attracting little attention from the fashionably-dressed employees of a nearby design studio. <\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong> <\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">But last November, the <em>JFK<\/em>\u2019s limbo status changed when the Navy decided to donate the 42-year-old carrier as a floating museum and memorial similar to the USS <em>Intrepid <\/em>in New York City. Suddenly, like an aging starlet given a final shot at fame, the spotlight shone again on the <em>JFK<\/em> as civic boosters up and down the East Coast dreamed of snagging this charismatically named ship.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><strong>Enter Portland<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">Portland, as it turns out, is home to a group of those dreamers. \u201cWe feel the <em>JFK<\/em> will be a wonderful addition to the waterfront skyline of Portland and South Portland,\u201d says Richard Fitzgerald, a director of the newly-formed USS <em>John F. Kennedy <\/em>Museum, a local non-profit seeking the carrier for Maine\u2019s largest city. On January 4, Portland City Council unanimously endorsed their efforts, while Gov. John Baldacci also offered his support. But landing any retired warship, let alone a 60,000-ton supercarrier that\u2019s 50 feet longer than Maine State Pier, is a multi-year and multi-million-dollar task. Fitzgerald says his group is up to the challenge, but veterans of the Navy\u2019s donation process offer a warning. \u201cYou have to be fanatical to get these ships,\u201d says F.W. \u201cRocco\u201d Montesano, director of the USS <em>Lexington<\/em> Museum on the Bay in Corpus Christi, Texas. \u201cBut fanatics aren\u2019t usually the best people to run them.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p><strong>Making the grade<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">Dreams and fanatics aside, the Navy runs its three-phase donation process on a strict timetable, and the first make-or-break deadline for the first phase fell in late January. As a result, Portland could be disqualified by the time this article is published. Or, it could be the only city in the Northeast still vying for the ship. [Editor&#8217;s note: On February 2nd the Navy announced that Portland advanced to Phase 2 of the donation process along with another unknown city. Boston, surprisingly, is not in the running]. Either way, Portland\u2019s ambitions are once again entwined with maritime history, and its residents must ponder\u2013literally\u2013how <em>big<\/em> a dream can a city dare?<\/span><\/p>\n<p><strong>Where would she go?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">If Portland were to win the <em>JFK<\/em>, the most obvious question would be, where to put her? Fitzgerald is guarded about specifics, but he does allow that the ship would be moored in the harbor, with the exact location up to city officials. \u201cIf they tell us to put it on Cumberland Avenue, we\u2019ll put it there,\u201d he jokes. Realistically, only a few places could accommodate a ship that\u2019s 1,052 feet long with a 30-foot draft. \u201cOne place that might work would be off the Eastern Promenade near the sewage treatment plant and Fort Allen Park,\u201d suggests Jeff Monroe, the city\u2019s former port director and now an executive at Halifax-based MacDonnell Group. \u201cDredging the shoreline could create a channel and protected berth for a deep-draft carrier, similar to what Long Beach did for the <em>Queen Mary<\/em>,\u201d he adds. At this stage, however, a precise location isn\u2019t required. \u201cMost applications will move to the second phase unless they are proposing a location that physically can\u2019t work,\u201d says Glen Clark, deputy program manager for the Navy\u2019s Inactive Ships Program, and one of the officials who reviews the applications.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\"><strong>Phase two<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">Identifying a suitable anchorage, however, is just one hurdle to overcome. If Portland is invited to compete in the second phase, Fitzgerald\u2019s group will have one year to submit a detailed business plan, fundraising program, and environmental impact statements. \u201cIt\u2019s a very daunting process and appropriately so,\u201d says Scott McGaugh, marketing director for the USS <em>Midway<\/em> Museum in San Diego. He estimates his group raised $8 million and submitted 3,000 pages during the 12 years it took to acquire the <em>Midway<\/em>. Their success, McGaugh offers, was due to three factors: an accessible location; a long-term, business-savvy board; and leadership that transitioned from visionaries to managers. \u201cI\u2019ve talked with 15 cities like Portland, and most failed because they didn\u2019t realize that getting the ship to town is nothing compared to running it as a\u2028successful, viable business,\u201d he adds. In McGaugh\u2019s estimation, the Navy is like a demanding banker looking to make a zero-risk loan.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\"><strong>Show me the money<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">\u201cIf the <em>JFK<\/em> ever came to Portland, the public would get stuck paying millions of dollars to maintain it,\u201d says Steven Scharf, a Portland resident active in conservative politics. Scharf, who opposes the <em>JFK<\/em> donation, points to the USS <em>Yorktown<\/em>, an aging aircraft carrier based in Charleston, South Carolina, that faces $100 million in dry-dock repairs and no plan\u2013except for a public bailout\u2013to pay for it. Even discounting expensive overhauls, most ship museums can\u2019t support themselves from ticket sales alone and must rely on grants, donations, and fund-raisers to fill their budgets. Another concern is that museum ships have reached a saturation point, with almost every East Coast city hosting a submarine, destroyer, or other naval attraction. \u201cThere\u2019s just not enough room for two aircraft carriers between New York and Maine,\u201d warns Francis Lennon, president of a group trying to lure the USS <em>Saratoga<\/em>, a carrier similar in size to the<em> JFK<\/em>, to Rhode Island. Plus, local Portland non-profits are concerned that the <em>JFK<\/em>\u2019s fund-raising efforts will exhaust the region\u2019s already meager donors.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\"><strong>One more mission<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">\u201cThey need to think outside the box,\u201d is Fitzgerald\u2019s response to critics. To raise the millions of dollars to acquire and maintain the <em>JFK<\/em>, his group plans to cash in on the national appeal of its presidential name. \u201cWhy wouldn\u2019t you support a project that is totally funded by deep-pocketed donors outside the city when all the money will be invested inside the harbor?\u201d Fitzgerald asks. Plus, he notes that the USS <em>John F. Kennedy <\/em>Association\u2013a group representing the carrier\u2019s former crew members\u2013has pledged to generate publicity and raise funds for Portland\u2019s bid. But most of all, Fitzgerald says he is confident that Portland can win the <em>JFK <\/em>based on community support. \u201cWhen we first discussed this project, we figured Portland\u2019s chances were 1 in 150 million,\u201d he says. \u201cBut when the council passed the resolution, those odds dropped to 1 in 10.\u201d Now he\u2019s hoping Portland residents, especially those who remember the <em>JFK<\/em>\u2019s last port call in October 1989, will join the effort to make the USS<em> John F. Kennedy<\/em> Museum, like Portland Head Light, a nationally recognized landmark that makes the whole city proud.<br \/>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">Coming in March: ussjfk.org, a website for the USS <em>John F. Kennedy Museum<\/em>, Portland. \u00a0A former staff editor at <em>Outside<\/em> and <em>Backpacker<\/em> magazines, Jason Stevenson writes for <em>Wired<\/em>, <em>Men\u2019s Journal<\/em>, <em>Boston<\/em>, and <em>Runner\u2019s World<\/em>. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\"><strong>&#8220;If I Were Governor\u2026&#8221;<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\"><strong>Where do Maine\u2019s gubernatorial candidates \u2028stand on bringing the JFK to Portland Harbor?<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">I support the coming of the <em>John F. Kennedy<\/em> to Portland. Having the ship in Maine waters is an opportunity for revenue to come to Maine. This will allow an increase of people-traffic to come to businesses\u2019 sidewalks, plus a lot more opportunities for the history of Maine with Bath Iron Works. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">\u2013Augustus J. Edgerton (I)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">It\u2019s unlikely that private fund-raising will cover even the transportation costs. The multi-million- dollar maintenance will inevitably fall to the city of Portland. There are far less expensive ways to boost tourism.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">\u2013Peter Mills (R)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">Yes, if it would create some type of secondary or after-market industry that could provide stable, long-term employment with benefits, not just sporadic or seasonal work.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">\u2013Samme Bailey (I)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">Yes, I am in support of the USS <em>John F. Kennedy<\/em> coming to Portland due to the history surrounding President Kennedy himself. He was a positive inspiration to many younger people to get involved in politics. Many of today\u2019s Democrats in office are directly due to President Kennedy\u2019s impact on politics.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">\u2013Peter Truman (D)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">I am very much in support of that. It would attract tourism, and it would support the military and be patriotic. My only concern would be if the ship was nuclear powered, as I am very anti-nuclear.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">\u2013Christopher Cambron (D)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">I\u2019m a huge supporter, as long as it didn\u2019t cost the taxpayers extra money. It should be voluntary on the taxpayers\u2019 part, and they should be involved in any discussion of how to fund it. I served aboard the USS<em> Thresher<\/em>, so I have an affinity for naval vessels, and I think it would be a great tourist attraction.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">\u2013J. Martin Vachon (R)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">It\u2019s a wonderful thing, bringing it to Maine and turning it into a museum. I can\u2019t imagine how the <em>JFK<\/em> wouldn\u2019t be a major tourist attraction. It would be wonderful.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">\u2013Paul LaPage (R)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">Before I could consider such a proposal, I\u2019d have to see a plan detailing private financing and logistics\u2013such as where the carrier would be anchored.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">\u2013Steve Abbott (R)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">Yes, I am in favor. I think it would be fascinating to explore a ship of that size. I think it would be a great learning tool, and it would no doubt give a boost to the local waterfront economy.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">\u2013John Whitcomb (I)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">I support bringing the <em>JFK<\/em> to Portland. The thing that we\u2019ll miss most from NAS Brunswick\u2019s closing is the demonstration of service in our community. Without that first-hand experience, Maine children will miss the lesson that our country is special and that dedicated men and women spend their lives defending it and us at great personal cost and risk. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">\u2013Matt Jacobson (R)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">My initial reaction is that it would be great to have a floating historical museum covering 40 years of history. But a quick yes or no should never happen to any recommendations made to increase tourism. We must always do our homework in looking at the pluses and minuses of bring the ship to Portland.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">\u2013Donna J. Dion (D)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">I think having it will encourage tourists to visit the area and offer a venue for many exciting events for Maine people. We need to make sure it fits into the vision for a vibrant working waterfront. What an opportunity to promote historic preservation and teaching!<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">\u2013Elizabeth \u201cLibby\u201d Mitchell (D)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">An aircraft carrier in Casco Bay would exemplify Maine\u2019s maritime and naval heritage and our strategic military and economic location as America\u2019s closest seaport to the European Union and North Atlantic.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">\u2013Bill Beardsley (R)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">Yes. This is a part of our history. It\u2019s always important to preserve our history, and if we can do that in Portland, then that\u2019s great.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">\u2013Lynne Williams (I)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">I support the efforts to bring the USS <em>Kennedy<\/em> to Portland as long as it can be operated and maintained as a floating museum through private funding, not state tax dollars.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">\u2013Eliot Cutler (I)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">Bringing the USS <em>John F. Kennedy <\/em>to Maine, either as a permanent attraction or as part of a temporary exhibition, is a great idea. Tourism equals jobs in Maine.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">\u2013Les Otten (R)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">I think it is a wonderful idea. I am in support as long as the organization can support the project. I\u2019d need to see financial projections for three to five years before approval.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">\u2013Beverly Cooper-Pete (I)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">I support the idea generally. However, issues such as berthing location, impact on other port activities, and funding must be considered. It should boost tourism and be a tribute to veterans.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">\u2013Steve Rowe (D)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">The local community would need to be interested. If Portland were interested, then I would use the influence of the office of governor to make it happen.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">\u2013John Richardson (D)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">Though an interesting proposal, costs and benefits must be carefully weighed, and all stakeholders heard\u2013particularly Portlanders, who might ultimately bear the cost, perhaps indefinitely, should the venture go awry.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">\u2013Rosa Scarcelli (D)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">I would support that. I was brought into politics by John F. Kennedy. I was on board when that ship was decommissioned in Boston, and I\u2019d love to land an airplane on it!<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">\u2013Patrick McGowan (D)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">Yes, I would support bringing the USS <em>JFK <\/em>to Portland and believe it would be an interesting tourist attraction.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">\u2013Bruce Poliquin (R)<\/span><br \/>\n<a onclick=\"return addthis_sendto()\" onmouseover=\"return addthis_open(this, '', '[URL]', '[TITLE]')\" onmouseout=\"addthis_close()\" href=\"http:\/\/www.addthis.com\/bookmark.php?v=250&amp;pub=portmag\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" style=\"border:0\" src=\"http:\/\/s7.addthis.com\/static\/btn\/lg-share-en.gif\" alt=\"Bookmark and Share\" width=\"125\" height=\"16\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.portlandmonthly.com\/portmag\/about\/contact-us\">send us your comments<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>February\/March 2010 Will the aircraft carrier USS Kennedy become a boffo tourist attraction on the Portland waterfront? The deeper question: When was the last time our city took a risk? By Jason Stevenson There are many ways to see the USS John F. Kennedy. Driving Interstate 95 near Philadelphia, you can spot the aircraft carrier\u2019s [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1767","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-featured"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.portlandmonthly.com\/portmag\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1767","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.portlandmonthly.com\/portmag\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.portlandmonthly.com\/portmag\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portlandmonthly.com\/portmag\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portlandmonthly.com\/portmag\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1767"}],"version-history":[{"count":16,"href":"https:\/\/www.portlandmonthly.com\/portmag\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1767\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1943,"href":"https:\/\/www.portlandmonthly.com\/portmag\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1767\/revisions\/1943"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.portlandmonthly.com\/portmag\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1767"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portlandmonthly.com\/portmag\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1767"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.portlandmonthly.com\/portmag\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1767"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}